Articles for real-world situations: proving what was online, handling disputes, documenting policy changes, and keeping evidence credible when content can be edited or deleted.
Two years into full Digital Services Act application: Article 16 notice and action requirements, the Article 22 trusted flagger framework, Member State Digital Services Coordinator designations including the Czech CJEU referral, Bundesnetzagentur and AGCOM examples, and the forensic evidence standards that distinguish high-priority DSA notices.
Digital Services ActArticle 16Trusted FlaggersNotice and Action
Article 19 timelines (4h / 72h / 1 month), major incident classification under Commission Delegated Regulation 2024/1772, the November 2025 designation of 19 Critical ICT Third-Party Providers, and forensic evidence preservation across DORA, NIS2 and GDPR. Updated May 2026 with one year of enforcement.
Article 23 reporting timelines (24-hour early warning, 72-hour notification, one-month final report), significant incident thresholds under Commission Implementing Regulation 2024/2690, forensic evidence preservation for phishing pages and ransomware leak sites, ISO 27037 chain of custody, sanctions up to €10M or 2% turnover, and personal liability of management. Updated May 2026 with transposition status across all 27 EU Member States.
From 2 August 2026, providers and deployers of generative AI must label synthetic content. This complete guide walks through every paragraph of Article 50, the multilayered marking approach, the Authentication Inversion that shifts burden of proof to publishers, the Provenance Gap that Article 50 leaves open, the role of C2PA and eIDAS qualified seals, and a practical 90-day implementation roadmap.
Complete 2026 guide to ISO/IEC 27037 compliant web evidence acquisition. DEFR/DES roles, the four core principles, rendered DOM, MHTML/WARC, SSL/TLS chain of trust, dual anchoring with eIDAS qualified timestamps and Bitcoin OpenTimestamps.
When archive.org snapshots are admissible in court, when they get excluded, and how to combine Wayback with forensic capture. US, EU, UK, and Australian case law (Weinhoffer, Valve, Gasperini, Pinnacle) plus FRE 902(13) self-authentication and the eIDAS framework.
Architecture, eIDAS compliance, ISO/IEC 27037 alignment, comparison with traditional DEM platforms, 25-point buyer's checklist, and use cases for legal services, compliance, IP enforcement, journalism, and insurance fraud investigation.
A practical, jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction guide covering all 27 EU member states. eIDAS Article 41, national procedural law, common defects, and the defensible workflow.
Article 41, qualified TSPs, EU Trusted List, court admissibility across 27 EU states. The definitive guide for lawyers, compliance officers, and forensic experts.
We use necessary cookies and optional analytics cookies (Google Analytics) to run the site. You can accept or reject each category individually.
Privacy Policy
Cookie settings
Choose which cookie categories you want to allow. Necessary cookies are always active — they are required for the site to function.
Necessary cookies
Required for site operation — login, language, consent storage. No tracking.
Always active
Analytics cookies
Visit tracking via Google Analytics 4 with IP anonymization. Helps us improve the product.
Google Analytics 4 · 26 months · US transfer (SCCs)
Marketing cookies
No marketing cookies are used at this time. This option is reserved for future use.
